Also, Swift generics are constraint-based (similar to C++20 concepts). At the time of writing, Swift doesn’t support non-type template parameters, template template parameters, and parameter packs. However, they have important differences. It may seem that C++ templates and Swift generics are similar. One of the most challenging issues is importing templates. This manifest discusses possible designs and trade-offs for C++/Swift interoperability. At the same time, C++ interop has a manifest with no clear implementation timeline. Swift’s team already provides C and Objective-C interoperability in their toolchains. In such cases, you might have only one choice: to write the bindings manually. However, if you wish to use a third-party library, then you would typically be in for a rough ride. You may benefit from such binding solutions if you are a library developer who is willing to write code that is easily convertible to other languages. Scapix, Gluecodium), they can only successfully map a subset of the C++ language. While there are automatic binding solutions present (e.g. These two languages do not have apparent one-to-one API mapping. C++-to-Swift bindings are a complicated story that heavily depends on what kind of C++ code you wish to port.
0 kommentar(er)
